memblock: Replace memblock_find_base() with memblock_find_in_range()

memblock_find_base() is a static function with two callers in
memblock.c and memblock_find_in_range() is a wrapper around it which
just changes the types and order of parameters.

Make memblock_find_in_range() take phys_addr_t instead of u64 for
consistency and replace memblock_find_base() with it.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 09:58:10 +02:00
committed by H. Peter Anvin
parent 1f5026a7e2
commit fc769a8e70
2 changed files with 9 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ extern int memblock_can_resize;
#define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
u64 memblock_find_in_range(u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align);
phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align);
int memblock_free_reserved_regions(void);
int memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(void);