mirror of
https://github.com/tbsdtv/linux_media.git
synced 2025-07-23 12:43:29 +02:00
lib/rbtree: avoid generating code twice for the cached versions
As was already noted in rbtree.h, the logic to cache rb_first (or rb_last) can easily be implemented externally to the core rbtree api. Change the implementation to do just that. Previously the update of rb_leftmost was wired deeper into the implmentation, but there were some disadvantages to that - mostly, lib/rbtree.c had separate instantiations for rb_insert_color() vs rb_insert_color_cached(), as well as rb_erase() vs rb_erase_cached(), which were doing exactly the same thing save for the rb_leftmost update at the start of either function. text data bss dec hex filename 5405 120 0 5525 1595 lib/rbtree.o-vanilla 3827 96 0 3923 f53 lib/rbtree.o-patch [dave@stgolabs.net: changelog addition] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190628171416.by5gdizl3rcxk5h5@linux-r8p5 [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190628045008.39926-1-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
4ab7ace465
commit
9f973cb380
@@ -32,25 +32,9 @@ struct rb_root {
|
||||
struct rb_node *rb_node;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Leftmost-cached rbtrees.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint
|
||||
* size vs number of potential users that could benefit
|
||||
* from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want
|
||||
* this feature can always implement the logic explicitly.
|
||||
* Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may
|
||||
* find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached {
|
||||
struct rb_root rb_root;
|
||||
struct rb_node *rb_leftmost;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define rb_parent(r) ((struct rb_node *)((r)->__rb_parent_color & ~3))
|
||||
|
||||
#define RB_ROOT (struct rb_root) { NULL, }
|
||||
#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }
|
||||
#define rb_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member)
|
||||
|
||||
#define RB_EMPTY_ROOT(root) (READ_ONCE((root)->rb_node) == NULL)
|
||||
@@ -72,12 +56,6 @@ extern struct rb_node *rb_prev(const struct rb_node *);
|
||||
extern struct rb_node *rb_first(const struct rb_root *);
|
||||
extern struct rb_node *rb_last(const struct rb_root *);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *,
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached *, bool);
|
||||
extern void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root_cached *);
|
||||
/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */
|
||||
#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost
|
||||
|
||||
/* Postorder iteration - always visit the parent after its children */
|
||||
extern struct rb_node *rb_first_postorder(const struct rb_root *);
|
||||
extern struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *);
|
||||
@@ -87,8 +65,6 @@ extern void rb_replace_node(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
|
||||
struct rb_root *root);
|
||||
extern void rb_replace_node_rcu(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
|
||||
struct rb_root *root);
|
||||
extern void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached *root);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
|
||||
struct rb_node **rb_link)
|
||||
@@ -136,4 +112,50 @@ static inline void rb_link_node_rcu(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent
|
||||
typeof(*pos), field); 1; }); \
|
||||
pos = n)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Leftmost-cached rbtrees.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint
|
||||
* size vs number of potential users that could benefit
|
||||
* from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want
|
||||
* this feature can always implement the logic explicitly.
|
||||
* Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may
|
||||
* find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached {
|
||||
struct rb_root rb_root;
|
||||
struct rb_node *rb_leftmost;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }
|
||||
|
||||
/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */
|
||||
#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *node,
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached *root,
|
||||
bool leftmost)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (leftmost)
|
||||
root->rb_leftmost = node;
|
||||
rb_insert_color(node, &root->rb_root);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node,
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached *root)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (root->rb_leftmost == node)
|
||||
root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);
|
||||
rb_erase(node, &root->rb_root);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim,
|
||||
struct rb_node *new,
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached *root)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (root->rb_leftmost == victim)
|
||||
root->rb_leftmost = new;
|
||||
rb_replace_node(victim, new, &root->rb_root);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _LINUX_RBTREE_H */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user