bpf: Allow rewriting to ports under ip_unprivileged_port_start

At the moment, BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_BIND hooks can rewrite user_port
to the privileged ones (< ip_unprivileged_port_start), but it will
be rejected later on in the __inet_bind or __inet6_bind.

Let's add another return value to indicate that CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
check should be ignored. Use the same idea as we currently use
in cgroup/egress where bit #1 indicates CN. Instead, for
cgroup/bind{4,6}, bit #1 indicates that CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE should
be bypassed.

v5:
- rename flags to be less confusing (Andrey Ignatov)
- rework BPF_PROG_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS_RUN_ARRAY to work on flags
  and accept BPF_RET_SET_CN (no behavioral changes)

v4:
- Add missing IPv6 support (Martin KaFai Lau)

v3:
- Update description (Martin KaFai Lau)
- Fix capability restore in selftest (Martin KaFai Lau)

v2:
- Switch to explicit return code (Martin KaFai Lau)

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127193140.3170382-1-sdf@google.com
This commit is contained in:
Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-27 11:31:39 -08:00
committed by Alexei Starovoitov
parent 8063e184e4
commit 772412176f
7 changed files with 84 additions and 37 deletions

View File

@@ -1055,6 +1055,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sk);
* @uaddr: sockaddr struct provided by user
* @type: The type of program to be exectuted
* @t_ctx: Pointer to attach type specific context
* @flags: Pointer to u32 which contains higher bits of BPF program
* return value (OR'ed together).
*
* socket is expected to be of type INET or INET6.
*
@@ -1064,7 +1066,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sk);
int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr(struct sock *sk,
struct sockaddr *uaddr,
enum bpf_attach_type type,
void *t_ctx)
void *t_ctx,
u32 *flags)
{
struct bpf_sock_addr_kern ctx = {
.sk = sk,
@@ -1087,7 +1090,8 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr(struct sock *sk,
}
cgrp = sock_cgroup_ptr(&sk->sk_cgrp_data);
ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], &ctx, BPF_PROG_RUN);
ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_FLAGS(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], &ctx,
BPF_PROG_RUN, flags);
return ret == 1 ? 0 : -EPERM;
}

View File

@@ -7986,6 +7986,9 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_CGROUP_INET4_GETSOCKNAME ||
env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_CGROUP_INET6_GETSOCKNAME)
range = tnum_range(1, 1);
if (env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_CGROUP_INET4_BIND ||
env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_CGROUP_INET6_BIND)
range = tnum_range(0, 3);
break;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB:
if (env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS) {