mirror of
https://github.com/tbsdtv/linux_media.git
synced 2025-07-23 12:43:29 +02:00
seccomp: allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together
The restriction introduced in 7a0df7fbc1
("seccomp: Make NEW_LISTENER and
TSYNC flags exclusive") is mostly artificial: there is enough information
in a seccomp user notification to tell which thread triggered a
notification. The reason it was introduced is because TSYNC makes the
syscall return a thread-id on failure, and NEW_LISTENER returns an fd, and
there's no way to distinguish between these two cases (well, I suppose the
caller could check all fds it has, then do the syscall, and if the return
value was an fd that already existed, then it must be a thread id, but
bleh).
Matthew would like to use these two flags together in the Chrome sandbox
which wants to use TSYNC for video drivers and NEW_LISTENER to proxy
syscalls.
So, let's fix this ugliness by adding another flag, TSYNC_ESRCH, which
tells the kernel to just return -ESRCH on a TSYNC error. This way,
NEW_LISTENER (and any subsequent seccomp() commands that want to return
positive values) don't conflict with each other.
Suggested-by: Matthew Denton <mpdenton@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304180517.23867-1-tycho@tycho.ws
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Kees Cook
parent
11a48a5a18
commit
51891498f2
@@ -528,8 +528,12 @@ static long seccomp_attach_filter(unsigned int flags,
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = seccomp_can_sync_threads();
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
if (flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH)
|
||||
return -ESRCH;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set log flag, if present. */
|
||||
@@ -1288,10 +1292,12 @@ static long seccomp_set_mode_filter(unsigned int flags,
|
||||
* In the successful case, NEW_LISTENER returns the new listener fd.
|
||||
* But in the failure case, TSYNC returns the thread that died. If you
|
||||
* combine these two flags, there's no way to tell whether something
|
||||
* succeeded or failed. So, let's disallow this combination.
|
||||
* succeeded or failed. So, let's disallow this combination if the user
|
||||
* has not explicitly requested no errors from TSYNC.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC) &&
|
||||
(flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER))
|
||||
(flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER) &&
|
||||
((flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH) == 0))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prepare the new filter before holding any locks. */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user