Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

Pull more vfs updates from Al Viro:
 "Assorted VFS fixes and related cleanups (IMO the most interesting in
  that part are f_path-related things and Eric's descriptor-related
  stuff).  UFS regression fixes (it got broken last cycle).  9P fixes.
  fs-cache series, DAX patches, Jan's file_remove_suid() work"

[ I'd say this is much more than "fixes and related cleanups".  The
  file_table locking rule change by Eric Dumazet is a rather big and
  fundamental update even if the patch isn't huge.   - Linus ]

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (49 commits)
  9p: cope with bogus responses from server in p9_client_{read,write}
  p9_client_write(): avoid double p9_free_req()
  9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC
  dax: bdev_direct_access() may sleep
  block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices
  dax: Use copy_from_iter_nocache
  dax: Add block size note to documentation
  fs/file.c: __fget() and dup2() atomicity rules
  fs/file.c: don't acquire files->file_lock in fd_install()
  fs:super:get_anon_bdev: fix race condition could cause dev exceed its upper limitation
  vfs: avoid creation of inode number 0 in get_next_ino
  namei: make set_root_rcu() return void
  make simple_positive() public
  ufs: use dir_pages instead of ufs_dir_pages()
  pagemap.h: move dir_pages() over there
  remove the pointless include of lglock.h
  fs: cleanup slight list_entry abuse
  xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and file capabilities
  fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate
  fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything
  ...
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds
2015-07-04 19:36:06 -07:00
99 changed files with 803 additions and 572 deletions

View File

@@ -496,16 +496,11 @@ struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *pare
return dentry;
}
static inline int tracefs_positive(struct dentry *dentry)
{
return dentry->d_inode && !d_unhashed(dentry);
}
static int __tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
{
int ret = 0;
if (tracefs_positive(dentry)) {
if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
if (dentry->d_inode) {
dget(dentry);
switch (dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
@@ -582,7 +577,7 @@ void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
*/
spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
if (!tracefs_positive(child))
if (!simple_positive(child))
continue;
/* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
@@ -603,7 +598,7 @@ void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
* from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can
* no longer trust that the next pointer is valid.
* Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the
* tracefs_positive() check.
* simple_positive() check.
*/
goto loop;
}